Difference between revisions of "Talk:Avalon World Tour"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Isn't Shambahla IN Tibet? Does adding it as a new destination count? It's not like Avalon sent them there. No one was awake to say the spell to return to Avalon. So either the monks or Coldstone or both or someone else put them in Shambahla. I mean putting it as a new World Tour destination is like saying Ishimura AND the Gargoyle Theme Park. It's repetitive. Avalon only sent them to one location and they moved around on their own terms or someone elses while there. --[[User:Matt|Matt]] October 18, 2007 | Isn't Shambahla IN Tibet? Does adding it as a new destination count? It's not like Avalon sent them there. No one was awake to say the spell to return to Avalon. So either the monks or Coldstone or both or someone else put them in Shambahla. I mean putting it as a new World Tour destination is like saying Ishimura AND the Gargoyle Theme Park. It's repetitive. Avalon only sent them to one location and they moved around on their own terms or someone elses while there. --[[User:Matt|Matt]] October 18, 2007 | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Ah, I see. I haven't got #6 yet, I was going by the Timeline. You have a point. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 18:50, 18 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:50, 18 October 2007
Isn't Shambahla IN Tibet? Does adding it as a new destination count? It's not like Avalon sent them there. No one was awake to say the spell to return to Avalon. So either the monks or Coldstone or both or someone else put them in Shambahla. I mean putting it as a new World Tour destination is like saying Ishimura AND the Gargoyle Theme Park. It's repetitive. Avalon only sent them to one location and they moved around on their own terms or someone elses while there. --Matt October 18, 2007
- Ah, I see. I haven't got #6 yet, I was going by the Timeline. You have a point. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 18:50, 18 October 2007 (CDT)
