Difference between revisions of "Talk:Labyrinth Clan"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
This isn't an actual suggestion that I think should be implemented, more something rhetorical to ponder. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 22:49, 29 August 2007 (CDT)
 
This isn't an actual suggestion that I think should be implemented, more something rhetorical to ponder. -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 22:49, 29 August 2007 (CDT)
 +
 +
:I think this is a pretty good idea, but I have one worry about it. We already have several clans that have subsections for former, current and future members, if we divide that up further I fear it'll get really disorganized since in some cases you'll have former beast members, former gargoyle members, current beast members, current gargoyle members, future beast members and future gargoyle members. And maybe one day we'll even add former, current and future HUMAN members That is a lot of sections and sometimes less is more.
 +
:I suppose that while I like the idea a lot, unless a better suggestion on format comes along, we should stay as is. Afterall, Greg W has said that while everyone knows that beasts and gargs are different species they also see the beasts just as much as members of the clan as the rest, might as well keep them all together. --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 11:42, 27 December 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 10:42, 27 December 2007

This may be a bogus idea, it's really more of a question.

We separate this clan into Mutates and Gargoyle members, right? Well, what about separating gargoyle and beast members of other clans? A gargoyle clan with beasts in it is still a gargoyle clan (unlike the way we categorize Labyrinth clan right now). But in the future, when they get a Beast (or we see the clan's future in Timedancer) where will we list beast members? Surely not in the "gargoyle members" part.

This isn't an actual suggestion that I think should be implemented, more something rhetorical to ponder. -- Vaevictis Asmadi 22:49, 29 August 2007 (CDT)

I think this is a pretty good idea, but I have one worry about it. We already have several clans that have subsections for former, current and future members, if we divide that up further I fear it'll get really disorganized since in some cases you'll have former beast members, former gargoyle members, current beast members, current gargoyle members, future beast members and future gargoyle members. And maybe one day we'll even add former, current and future HUMAN members That is a lot of sections and sometimes less is more.
I suppose that while I like the idea a lot, unless a better suggestion on format comes along, we should stay as is. Afterall, Greg W has said that while everyone knows that beasts and gargs are different species they also see the beasts just as much as members of the clan as the rest, might as well keep them all together. --Matt 11:42, 27 December 2007 (CST)