Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ollie"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:I can see that. The actual individual is canonical. If we were going to have a page, we'd have to call it something. The canon-in-training name for a canon individual makes a certain amount of sense. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:35, 9 April 2013 (PDT)
 
:I can see that. The actual individual is canonical. If we were going to have a page, we'd have to call it something. The canon-in-training name for a canon individual makes a certain amount of sense. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:35, 9 April 2013 (PDT)
 +
 +
::I'd say Ollie (the individual) is canon.  As for the article's name, Supermorff, what we have right now for [[Stuart Canmore]] already fits the pattern you described: Canon character, CIT name for the article --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 17:46, 10 April 2013 (PDT)

Latest revision as of 17:46, 10 April 2013

Is this CiT? The kid was mentioned in the show. The name and gender are CiT, though. I can see arguments for both. But since he was alluded to on the show, I lean towards canon. --GregX 11:02, 9 April 2013 (PDT)

I can see that. The actual individual is canonical. If we were going to have a page, we'd have to call it something. The canon-in-training name for a canon individual makes a certain amount of sense. -- Supermorff 12:35, 9 April 2013 (PDT)
I'd say Ollie (the individual) is canon. As for the article's name, Supermorff, what we have right now for Stuart Canmore already fits the pattern you described: Canon character, CIT name for the article --Pheon 17:46, 10 April 2013 (PDT)