Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supermorff"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
:Or, we could do it by season. "Category:Season 1 episodes", "Category:Season 2 episodes", "Category:The Goliath Chronicles episodes", "Category:SLG episodes", etc. At the moment I'm leaning towards the latter. Do you have a preference? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 17:05, 4 February 2007 (CST)
 
:Or, we could do it by season. "Category:Season 1 episodes", "Category:Season 2 episodes", "Category:The Goliath Chronicles episodes", "Category:SLG episodes", etc. At the moment I'm leaning towards the latter. Do you have a preference? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 17:05, 4 February 2007 (CST)
  
Just leave it as is.
+
Just leave it as is. <small>--The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:Greg Bishansky]] ([[User talk:Greg Bishansky|talk]]).</small>
 +
 
 +
:That's not really convincing, considering I've already expressed dissatisfaction with the status quo. If you really believe that the current system is the best of all options, then I'll gladly hear you out, but right now I can't see the merits of it over other possibilities (save that it would be easier to leave things alone, which is no sort of reason).
 +
:Take the by-season idea. This would make the episodes easier to search for using the categories. It would keep the episodic comic issues on equal footing with the older televised episodes. It would also allow paragraphs at the head of each season to sum up the important occurences and themes ("expansion" for season 2 comes immediately to mind), as well as general background information.
 +
:If there's something you dislike about this suggestion, then we can keep working to find a suitable compromise. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:40, 5 February 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 11:40, 5 February 2007

Thanks

Hey, I would like to thank you for your help in improving the GargWiki, and making things more organized. You've catched little errors that even I've missed. Thanks. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Greg Bishansky (talk).

You're very welcome. Keep up the good work. -- Supermorff 12:02, 3 February 2007 (CST)

Comic

The comic book is included in the episode category as well, because that's how Greg Weisman wants it. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Greg Bishansky (talk).

Well I won't dispute that, but the way things currently stand (category-wise) doesn't seem right to me. There's no sensible reason for having a category, such as "Category:Comic Book", if all of the pages are in another category elsewhere. I'd make it a subcategory, except that I think it would make more sense to rename it first, for example to "Category:SLG issues".
As a compromise if it was renamed, we could make a new category, e.g. "Category:Gargoyles episodes" or "Category:TV episodes", solely for the original 65, also a subcat of "Category:Episodes". We could empty out the parent cat entirely, except for the list of canon episodes and the subcats.
Or, we could do it by season. "Category:Season 1 episodes", "Category:Season 2 episodes", "Category:The Goliath Chronicles episodes", "Category:SLG episodes", etc. At the moment I'm leaning towards the latter. Do you have a preference? -- Supermorff 17:05, 4 February 2007 (CST)

Just leave it as is. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Greg Bishansky (talk).

That's not really convincing, considering I've already expressed dissatisfaction with the status quo. If you really believe that the current system is the best of all options, then I'll gladly hear you out, but right now I can't see the merits of it over other possibilities (save that it would be easier to leave things alone, which is no sort of reason).
Take the by-season idea. This would make the episodes easier to search for using the categories. It would keep the episodic comic issues on equal footing with the older televised episodes. It would also allow paragraphs at the head of each season to sum up the important occurences and themes ("expansion" for season 2 comes immediately to mind), as well as general background information.
If there's something you dislike about this suggestion, then we can keep working to find a suitable compromise. -- Supermorff 12:40, 5 February 2007 (CST)