Difference between revisions of "Talk:Leo"
Demonskrye (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Linked by their grief over Griff's loss, Leo and Una grew closer together and became mates. It is very likely that they were rookery parents to the hatchlings of the 1958, 1978 and 1998 rookeries." Should we change this since we now know that the London clan doesn't allow couples to concieve a third egg? While 1998 is still "Gargoyles" universe future, it seems unlikely to me that the clan will change this policy in the next two years unless there is some kind of major change that allows them to. -- [[User:Demonskrye|Demonskrye]] 14:47, 18 April 2008 (CDT) | "Linked by their grief over Griff's loss, Leo and Una grew closer together and became mates. It is very likely that they were rookery parents to the hatchlings of the 1958, 1978 and 1998 rookeries." Should we change this since we now know that the London clan doesn't allow couples to concieve a third egg? While 1998 is still "Gargoyles" universe future, it seems unlikely to me that the clan will change this policy in the next two years unless there is some kind of major change that allows them to. -- [[User:Demonskrye|Demonskrye]] 14:47, 18 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Well, at any rate, the policy would've had to be different in 1987 when conception would've occured for the 1998 generation. I think the system has been in place for some time, so I think I'll go ahead and edit the entries. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 17:49, 18 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:49, 18 April 2008
"Linked by their grief over Griff's loss, Leo and Una grew closer together and became mates. It is very likely that they were rookery parents to the hatchlings of the 1958, 1978 and 1998 rookeries." Should we change this since we now know that the London clan doesn't allow couples to concieve a third egg? While 1998 is still "Gargoyles" universe future, it seems unlikely to me that the clan will change this policy in the next two years unless there is some kind of major change that allows them to. -- Demonskrye 14:47, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
- Well, at any rate, the policy would've had to be different in 1987 when conception would've occured for the 1998 generation. I think the system has been in place for some time, so I think I'll go ahead and edit the entries. -- Matt 17:49, 18 April 2008 (CDT)
