Difference between revisions of "Talk:Shahrizad"
Lonerider26 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Do you all think that we should change [[Shari]]'s picture on her wiki page to the one used for the feature? The one we have now has Sevarius's elbow in the way... ~ [[User:Lonerider26|lonerider26]] | Do you all think that we should change [[Shari]]'s picture on her wiki page to the one used for the feature? The one we have now has Sevarius's elbow in the way... ~ [[User:Lonerider26|lonerider26]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Personally, I think the picture should remain the same as it is for now. It is in color, which is nice, especially on that character's page. It shows a more or less full body angle of the character, which is excellent. And I also think that the Feature Articles should have different pictures most of the time, as it makes them more unique and visually interesting. So I guess I wouldn't have any problems with putting a new picture of Shari on her page as long as it was a good picture and preferably different from the Feature picture. If someone wants to pull one up, great, but we have a lot of pages still needing a first picture, so I'd say it was a low priority. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 21:44, 16 October 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 16 October 2008
New picture?
Do you all think that we should change Shari's picture on her wiki page to the one used for the feature? The one we have now has Sevarius's elbow in the way... ~ lonerider26
Personally, I think the picture should remain the same as it is for now. It is in color, which is nice, especially on that character's page. It shows a more or less full body angle of the character, which is excellent. And I also think that the Feature Articles should have different pictures most of the time, as it makes them more unique and visually interesting. So I guess I wouldn't have any problems with putting a new picture of Shari on her page as long as it was a good picture and preferably different from the Feature picture. If someone wants to pull one up, great, but we have a lot of pages still needing a first picture, so I'd say it was a low priority. -- Matt 21:44, 16 October 2008 (CDT)
