Difference between revisions of "Talk:Aesir"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I believe the reason this page has been marked as CiT is because the name itself has never been used in the series and it is unclear what the exact status of this group is in the canon universe. I actually think we should keep the page CiT until the term is used in the series. Until that point, Odin is just one of the Third Race associated with the norse countries.
 
I believe the reason this page has been marked as CiT is because the name itself has never been used in the series and it is unclear what the exact status of this group is in the canon universe. I actually think we should keep the page CiT until the term is used in the series. Until that point, Odin is just one of the Third Race associated with the norse countries.
 
To be entirely frank, I'm not sure why this page exists here at all. It has very little to do with the series. It is something akin to me creating a page for the Great Wall of China. We assume it exists in the Gargoyles Universe, it makes sense that it does, but it isn't relevant (yet) to Gargoyles and therefore to this site. So my vote is to delete the page, but I doubt that'll happen, so at least I think it needs to be canon-in-training. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 18:28, 6 January 2009 (CST)
 
To be entirely frank, I'm not sure why this page exists here at all. It has very little to do with the series. It is something akin to me creating a page for the Great Wall of China. We assume it exists in the Gargoyles Universe, it makes sense that it does, but it isn't relevant (yet) to Gargoyles and therefore to this site. So my vote is to delete the page, but I doubt that'll happen, so at least I think it needs to be canon-in-training. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 18:28, 6 January 2009 (CST)
 +
 +
:But the Norse gods were mentioned, by Gunther in "Eye of the Storm."  They are the Aesir. --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 18:38, 6 January 2009 (CST)
  
 
OK, this is where things start to get confusing.  We know that Odin, the leader of the Aesir and father of some of them, is fully Third Race.  Slepnir, on the other hand, is said in Norse myth to be the son of Loki (presumably one of Oberon's Children himself) and a mortal stallion.  So is he of the Third Race?  Is he even considered an Aesir, being a horse and all?  Or take the Greek pantheon as an example.  It's possible that all of the Greek gods were the children of what were then known as Mab's Children and mortal humans.  But if some of the original Greek gods were fully Third Race, then we wouldn't be able to say that Greek Gods were a subset of Oberon's (or Mab's) Children.  Dionysus was the son of Zeus and a mortal woman, and some of the gods had one or more titan parents and who knows what the titans were.  My point here is that it's going to be awfully hard to say definitively that certain pantheons are truly subgroups of Oberon's Children just based on the fact that one or some of them are. -- [[User:Demonskrye|Demonskrye]] 18:34, 6 January 2009 (CST)
 
OK, this is where things start to get confusing.  We know that Odin, the leader of the Aesir and father of some of them, is fully Third Race.  Slepnir, on the other hand, is said in Norse myth to be the son of Loki (presumably one of Oberon's Children himself) and a mortal stallion.  So is he of the Third Race?  Is he even considered an Aesir, being a horse and all?  Or take the Greek pantheon as an example.  It's possible that all of the Greek gods were the children of what were then known as Mab's Children and mortal humans.  But if some of the original Greek gods were fully Third Race, then we wouldn't be able to say that Greek Gods were a subset of Oberon's (or Mab's) Children.  Dionysus was the son of Zeus and a mortal woman, and some of the gods had one or more titan parents and who knows what the titans were.  My point here is that it's going to be awfully hard to say definitively that certain pantheons are truly subgroups of Oberon's Children just based on the fact that one or some of them are. -- [[User:Demonskrye|Demonskrye]] 18:34, 6 January 2009 (CST)

Revision as of 16:38, 6 January 2009

I believe the reason this page has been marked as CiT is because the name itself has never been used in the series and it is unclear what the exact status of this group is in the canon universe. I actually think we should keep the page CiT until the term is used in the series. Until that point, Odin is just one of the Third Race associated with the norse countries. To be entirely frank, I'm not sure why this page exists here at all. It has very little to do with the series. It is something akin to me creating a page for the Great Wall of China. We assume it exists in the Gargoyles Universe, it makes sense that it does, but it isn't relevant (yet) to Gargoyles and therefore to this site. So my vote is to delete the page, but I doubt that'll happen, so at least I think it needs to be canon-in-training. -- Matt 18:28, 6 January 2009 (CST)

But the Norse gods were mentioned, by Gunther in "Eye of the Storm." They are the Aesir. --GregX 18:38, 6 January 2009 (CST)

OK, this is where things start to get confusing. We know that Odin, the leader of the Aesir and father of some of them, is fully Third Race. Slepnir, on the other hand, is said in Norse myth to be the son of Loki (presumably one of Oberon's Children himself) and a mortal stallion. So is he of the Third Race? Is he even considered an Aesir, being a horse and all? Or take the Greek pantheon as an example. It's possible that all of the Greek gods were the children of what were then known as Mab's Children and mortal humans. But if some of the original Greek gods were fully Third Race, then we wouldn't be able to say that Greek Gods were a subset of Oberon's (or Mab's) Children. Dionysus was the son of Zeus and a mortal woman, and some of the gods had one or more titan parents and who knows what the titans were. My point here is that it's going to be awfully hard to say definitively that certain pantheons are truly subgroups of Oberon's Children just based on the fact that one or some of them are. -- Demonskrye 18:34, 6 January 2009 (CST)