Difference between revisions of "Talk:Battle of Rathveramoen"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, I did some research and discovered that the Battle of Rathveramoen fell on October 18th, 997. Or, at least that was the night of the Hunter's Moon. Here's my source: http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/?year=997&country=23 So, shall we mark this as the date? --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 02:32, 5 August 2010 (CDT) | So, I did some research and discovered that the Battle of Rathveramoen fell on October 18th, 997. Or, at least that was the night of the Hunter's Moon. Here's my source: http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/?year=997&country=23 So, shall we mark this as the date? --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 02:32, 5 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :I'd say go ahead and add it, but add it as canon-in-training. We have no reason to doubt it is the actual date and every reason to suspect that it is correct, but since it was not directly referenced in canon, I don't feel right about stating it as such. Good find, Greg! -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 07:14, 5 August 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:14, 5 August 2010
So, I did some research and discovered that the Battle of Rathveramoen fell on October 18th, 997. Or, at least that was the night of the Hunter's Moon. Here's my source: http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/?year=997&country=23 So, shall we mark this as the date? --GregX 02:32, 5 August 2010 (CDT)
- I'd say go ahead and add it, but add it as canon-in-training. We have no reason to doubt it is the actual date and every reason to suspect that it is correct, but since it was not directly referenced in canon, I don't feel right about stating it as such. Good find, Greg! -- Matt 07:14, 5 August 2010 (CDT)
