Difference between revisions of "Talk:"Second""
Phoenician (talk | contribs) (nothing to see here, just getting rid of an unwanted non-existent page link with a proper non-existent user page link (there is a distinction, evidently)) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
If Demona's Second's Mate's page is titled "Sacrifice", should Demona's Second's page be titled "Second"? That's how Greg W referred to him, right? -- [[User:Litwolf|Litwolf]] 25 August 2009 | If Demona's Second's Mate's page is titled "Sacrifice", should Demona's Second's page be titled "Second"? That's how Greg W referred to him, right? -- [[User:Litwolf|Litwolf]] 25 August 2009 | ||
| − | Since Second and his mate hatched in 918, they would have had an egg that hatched with the 978 rookery. Does anyone else think that should be added as on both pages?-- [[ | + | Since Second and his mate hatched in 918, they would have had an egg that hatched with the 978 rookery. Does anyone else think that should be added as on both pages?-- [[User:Carl006|Carl006]] |
Revision as of 22:45, 16 March 2023
Is Demona's Second in "The Gate"? I'm flipping through it now and the only gargoyles I see in that issue are Brooklyn, Demona, and the unfortunate sleeping cell. -- Demonskrye 12:07, 24 August 2009 (CDT)
- No, he's not in "The Gate", just "Tyrants" and "Phoenix", the issues where more of Demona's clan is shown. -- Litwolf 24 August 2009
If Demona's Second's Mate's page is titled "Sacrifice", should Demona's Second's page be titled "Second"? That's how Greg W referred to him, right? -- Litwolf 25 August 2009
Since Second and his mate hatched in 918, they would have had an egg that hatched with the 978 rookery. Does anyone else think that should be added as on both pages?-- Carl006
