Talk:Shahrizad

New picture?

Do you all think that we should change Shari's picture on her wiki page to the one used for the feature? The one we have now has Sevarius's elbow in the way... ~ lonerider26

Personally, I think the picture should remain the same as it is for now. It is in color, which is nice, especially on that character's page. It shows a more or less full body angle of the character, which is excellent. And I also think that the Feature Articles should have different pictures most of the time, as it makes them more unique and visually interesting. So I guess I wouldn't have any problems with putting a new picture of Shari on her page as long as it was a good picture and preferably different from the Feature picture. If someone wants to pull one up, great, but we have a lot of pages still needing a first picture, so I'd say it was a low priority. -- Matt 21:44, 16 October 2008 (CDT)

And we finally have a higher rez version of that same pic. Stephanie Lostimolo was nice enough to send one my way. --GregX 21:53, 28 December 2008 (CST)

Ah, O.K. I still love that picture though, it's one of the best ones yet ;)

I could look through my comics for any good ones, if you want me to. I have no problem with it.

Also, it looked like Shari's style has changed since that picture. In the Bad Guys pic, her shirt is longer. So, either Karine changed it, or she forgot how long it was. ~ lonerider26

Or, Shari has more than one shirt. --GregX 21:53, 28 December 2008 (CST)

I have three different pictures, which one do you want? [1] [2] [3] If you want any, that is... ~ lonerider26

I also uploaded a ton of wanted pictures. Tell me if you like them :)~ lonerider26

Appearances

How do we want to list appearances for characters that appear in prose? I think Shari "appears" in "The Reach", but we don't see here, but she talks, so it is kind of tricky. Maybe something like - The Reach - (Spoke in Prose) or something. Gets even trickier with someone like Mary who is mentioned only in prose form but has no lines! -- Matt (talk) 07:50, 13 July 2023 (PDT)

We are lucky to have such problems. But I have no idea what to do here. But we need to think of something, because who knows what the future holds... we just might get a canon novel some day. We're getting so much else. --GregX (talk) 07:59, 13 July 2023 (PDT)

Yes, happy to have these troubles. I'm hoping Disney+ just decides to give 2198 a try or something. One can dream. Anyway, maybe we just keep it simple and say Shari appeared here and Mary appeared (mentioned only)? It is a different form, so tricky, but I don't want to make a mess of the appearances sections either. -- Matt (talk) 08:11, 13 July 2023 (PDT)

Given the different medium, I'm ok with Shari getting the appearance credit (and Mary getting the Mentioned Only, but the "Lead Player" getting a full appearance given his brief actions in the prologue). But I'm still not sold on her appearing in "The Reach", but rather in "The Tale of the Three Brothers". But that's another discussion to figure out. --Pheon (talk) 11:22, 13 July 2023 (PDT)

So, for their appearance sections, we can credit Shari with a full appearance in "The Reach", and give Mary a "Mentioned Only". As we decipher the other characters, we can sort out what appearance credit they'll get, yes? --Pheon (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2023 (PDT)

Why the (Name Provided) note on Bash? Is that important? If so, there are lots of characters who didn't get names in their first episode that we should add this to (the trio, Hudson, and Bronx, Vinnie, Ophelia, Mary, etc. etc. -- Matt (talk) 06:42, 14 July 2023 (PDT)

Yeah, I find that unnecessary, too. --GregX (talk) 07:00, 14 July 2023 (PDT)

It also occurs to me that we could treat the appearances of characters in prose not dissimilarly to how we did with all the characters that appeared in Shari's stories in the Stone of Destiny arc. I guess that's essentially what we are doing, so I'm glad we are being consistent. -- Matt (talk) 05:00, 16 July 2023 (PDT)