Difference between revisions of "Talk:"Kermit""
Demonskrye (talk | contribs) |
Phoenician (talk | contribs) m (Phoenician moved page Talk:Kermit to Talk:"Kermit": per discussion) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::I think that's a great idea. Just get rid of the quotation marks. [[User:Dtaina|DTaina]] 23:23, 25 August 2009 (CDT) | ::I think that's a great idea. Just get rid of the quotation marks. [[User:Dtaina|DTaina]] 23:23, 25 August 2009 (CDT) | ||
:::How about we use the quotation marks once at the beginning of the article in the sentence that explains that the gargoyle is actually unnamed and then refrain from using them for the remainder of the article? I think that would make it easier to understand at a glance that the name is just a non-canon identifier. -- [[User:Demonskrye|Demonskrye]] 07:34, 26 August 2009 (CDT) | :::How about we use the quotation marks once at the beginning of the article in the sentence that explains that the gargoyle is actually unnamed and then refrain from using them for the remainder of the article? I think that would make it easier to understand at a glance that the name is just a non-canon identifier. -- [[User:Demonskrye|Demonskrye]] 07:34, 26 August 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::::That is probably wise. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 07:39, 26 August 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::::OK, I'll give it a shot that way. If we don't like it, we can always try it with no quotes or some other format later. -- [[User:Demonskrye|Demonskrye]] 08:34, 26 August 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is it okay if I add [[The Rock]] to Kermit's appearances? It's a little hard to make out but you can actually see him crouched behind Demona at Macbeth's coranation. | ||
| + | :Oh yeah! Good call on that one! -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 21:49, 25 October 2009 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:26, 24 July 2023
Do we really need all these quotation marks? Maybe we can just make the names blue and leave out the quotation marks. DTaina 23:13, 25 August 2009 (CDT)
- Yeah, but putting them in blue implies the names are canon-in-training when they are not. They are merely a tool for us silly humans that need names. I suppose we could state in the opening paragraph that these are not true names. Although, come to think of it, we don't do that for Othello, Desdemona or Iago. This is essentially the exact same situation. Maybe we should drop the quotations altogether and merely note that the gargoyle is nameless and the name is only a reference tool. Thoughts? --Matt 23:21, 25 August 2009 (CDT)
- I think that's a great idea. Just get rid of the quotation marks. DTaina 23:23, 25 August 2009 (CDT)
- How about we use the quotation marks once at the beginning of the article in the sentence that explains that the gargoyle is actually unnamed and then refrain from using them for the remainder of the article? I think that would make it easier to understand at a glance that the name is just a non-canon identifier. -- Demonskrye 07:34, 26 August 2009 (CDT)
- That is probably wise. -- Matt 07:39, 26 August 2009 (CDT)
- OK, I'll give it a shot that way. If we don't like it, we can always try it with no quotes or some other format later. -- Demonskrye 08:34, 26 August 2009 (CDT)
- That is probably wise. -- Matt 07:39, 26 August 2009 (CDT)
- How about we use the quotation marks once at the beginning of the article in the sentence that explains that the gargoyle is actually unnamed and then refrain from using them for the remainder of the article? I think that would make it easier to understand at a glance that the name is just a non-canon identifier. -- Demonskrye 07:34, 26 August 2009 (CDT)
- I think that's a great idea. Just get rid of the quotation marks. DTaina 23:23, 25 August 2009 (CDT)
Is it okay if I add The Rock to Kermit's appearances? It's a little hard to make out but you can actually see him crouched behind Demona at Macbeth's coranation.
- Oh yeah! Good call on that one! -- Matt 21:49, 25 October 2009 (CDT)
