Difference between revisions of "Talk:Minotaur (New Olympian)"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I feel like this page should be "Taurus's Father". Taurus mentioned that the Minotaur of legend was an ancestor of his, not his father. I see that the design art labeled the character as Minotaur, but that doesn't mean much. Thoughts? --[[User:Matt|Matt]] ([[User talk:Matt|talk]]) 20:55, 15 December 2023 (PST) | I feel like this page should be "Taurus's Father". Taurus mentioned that the Minotaur of legend was an ancestor of his, not his father. I see that the design art labeled the character as Minotaur, but that doesn't mean much. Thoughts? --[[User:Matt|Matt]] ([[User talk:Matt|talk]]) 20:55, 15 December 2023 (PST) | ||
:His ancestor was "The Minotaur", his father could have been named "Minotaur" after the one we know from the myth. I get where you're coming from, and while I'd also bet the name "Minotaur" was a placeholder, it's also the closest thing we have to a name. But, I'm not married to keeping it "Minotaur". --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] ([[User talk:Greg Bishansky|talk]]) 21:35, 15 December 2023 (PST) | :His ancestor was "The Minotaur", his father could have been named "Minotaur" after the one we know from the myth. I get where you're coming from, and while I'd also bet the name "Minotaur" was a placeholder, it's also the closest thing we have to a name. But, I'm not married to keeping it "Minotaur". --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] ([[User talk:Greg Bishansky|talk]]) 21:35, 15 December 2023 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I don't think it is the closest thing we have to a name. Taurus's Father is much closer. I look at the design art as labeling a species or general appearance. Like saying "Incidental Character: Human". Better to be referred to as someone's father than simply a member of a species. Like you, I'm not that concerned about this. Just caught my eye when I came across the page and thought I'd mention it. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] ([[User talk:Matt|talk]]) 09:05, 16 December 2023 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:05, 16 December 2023
I feel like this page should be "Taurus's Father". Taurus mentioned that the Minotaur of legend was an ancestor of his, not his father. I see that the design art labeled the character as Minotaur, but that doesn't mean much. Thoughts? --Matt (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2023 (PST)
- His ancestor was "The Minotaur", his father could have been named "Minotaur" after the one we know from the myth. I get where you're coming from, and while I'd also bet the name "Minotaur" was a placeholder, it's also the closest thing we have to a name. But, I'm not married to keeping it "Minotaur". --GregX (talk) 21:35, 15 December 2023 (PST)
- I don't think it is the closest thing we have to a name. Taurus's Father is much closer. I look at the design art as labeling a species or general appearance. Like saying "Incidental Character: Human". Better to be referred to as someone's father than simply a member of a species. Like you, I'm not that concerned about this. Just caught my eye when I came across the page and thought I'd mention it. -- Matt (talk) 09:05, 16 December 2023 (PST)
