Talk:Manhattan Clan
Is there any way to mark the heading to the "Future Members" section go under the CIT template? I tired the most straightforward way, but it didn't seem to work. Technically, all future members are CIT and having the header in blue text would help to make it clear that all additions of future members, even those who have only the linked name listed which will not turn blue, are CIT. -- Demonskrye 18:38, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
- It looks like there may be technical restrictions to doing this. Even so, I don't think it a big deal as the notations following each future member makes it clear what is CiT... I just had a thought of what might work... -- Matt 18:55, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
- Well, I made it work. I'm still not convinced it was neccesary, but I have no problem with it either. -- Matt 18:56, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
The Whole Clan
Can someone get the picture of the whole clan from the last page of the comic, preferably without the dialogue? I'd love to keep the founding members picture, but having a pic of the enitre current clan seems like a cool and better idea. Thanks -- Matt 13:40, 16 August 2009 (CDT)
- I agree, and D.Taina and I are working on it. --GregX 15:03, 16 August 2009 (CDT)
Elisa's "generation"
Not really loving how this is currently shown in the members section. What about:
Born 1968
- Elisa Maza
--Matt (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2023 (PST)
- That was why I was wondering what the thoughts were about the Labyrinth Clan. That, and the Avalon Clan are the only other clans with non-gargoyles as members. Since you favored the parentheticals in both of those clans, I was up for:
- Elisa Maza (born 1968)
- But how do we make sure she doesn't look like she gets shuffled in with the Unknown Generations category above her? I don't mind whatever is decided, but I would think it'd be preferable if we had a similar pattern for any clan page that needs it. --Pheon (talk) 08:17, 26 November 2023 (PST)
With the current edit, I think it looks more like she's part of the unknown generations category. I think the clearest plan is to make 1968 it's own category (though not list it as a generation). It will stand out from all the rookery generations, but that's fine. She's a human member after all!--Matt (talk) 10:53, 26 November 2023 (PST)
