Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Canon characters"
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
"Articles in this category may contain non-canonical information, and be included also in the "Apocrypha" category or the "Canon-in-training" category." | "Articles in this category may contain non-canonical information, and be included also in the "Apocrypha" category or the "Canon-in-training" category." | ||
and the statement in the Characters by canonicity which says | and the statement in the Characters by canonicity which says | ||
| − | "This category lists characters according to their canonical status in the Gargoyles universe. Every character should appear in exactly one of the following subcategories." | + | "This category lists characters according to their canonical status in the Gargoyles universe. Every character should appear in exactly one of the following subcategories." - Vaevictis Asmadi |
Revision as of 12:19, 4 March 2007
I think there's a contradiction somewhere between this statement "Articles in this category may contain non-canonical information, and be included also in the "Apocrypha" category or the "Canon-in-training" category." and the statement in the Characters by canonicity which says "This category lists characters according to their canonical status in the Gargoyles universe. Every character should appear in exactly one of the following subcategories." - Vaevictis Asmadi
