Talk:Dominic Dracon (Apocrypha)

Explain to me again why we have separate pages for Apocrypha, as opposed to just making it a section of such-and-such character's regular page?--Gweisman 14:45, 11 September 2009 (CDT)

I believe it was originally for Goliath Chronicles. But, if you think we should integrate them into main pages, I'm fine either way. --GregX 14:55, 11 September 2009 (CDT)

I don't feel strongly, but I don't really get the need for a separate page, when a separate section would seemingly do the trick. But maybe I'm missing the rationale.--Gweisman 06:29, 12 September 2009 (CDT)

Looking back at the discussion we had in Category Talk:Apocrypha, I think the reason the separate articles happened was because the main articles for the canon characters were being categorized as Apocrypha as well as Canon, which did not make a lot of sense. I suggested that separate articles be made for the characters histories in the apocrypha, but looking back, that may not have been the best possible solution (though it was certainly better than categorizing canon character articles as Apocrypha just because they contained some apocryphal info). I would not be averse to making these articles into Apocrypha sections on the main character articles, provided that there is some kind of disclaimer at the beginning of the section in case readers neglected to note what "apocrypha" means on the main page and so long as no one tries to put main character articles under Apocrypha again. -- Demonskrye 07:17, 13 September 2009 (CDT)