Difference between revisions of "Talk:Old Pog"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It would probably be a good idea to ask Greg anyway though, but it just seems obvious to me.--[[User:PGFish|PGFish]] 15:20, 29 March 2008 (CDT) | It would probably be a good idea to ask Greg anyway though, but it just seems obvious to me.--[[User:PGFish|PGFish]] 15:20, 29 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I think you are probably right, but writing something as canon because it "seems obvious" seems risky to me. I've asked Greg over at Ask Greg, so hopefully we'll have confirmation soon. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 15:37, 29 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 29 March 2008
Okay, like Lunette, we have nothing to prove that Old Pog ever appeared in this issue. It is possible, but not certain. I feel uncomfortable putting that up as canon without a confirmation from the comic or at least a nod of approval from Greg. -- Matt 14:52, 29 March 2008 (CDT)
I think it's more than likely that those two stone gargoyles are Pog and Lunette. Judging by the way Greg positions the panels in the last two comics, everything basically logically fits together. The fact that the picture with the two unknown stone gargoyles comes right between the panels with Staghart describing them, seems to be pretty strong evidence to me. Two random un-named gargoyles wouldn't make much sense positioned there.
It would probably be a good idea to ask Greg anyway though, but it just seems obvious to me.--PGFish 15:20, 29 March 2008 (CDT)
- I think you are probably right, but writing something as canon because it "seems obvious" seems risky to me. I've asked Greg over at Ask Greg, so hopefully we'll have confirmation soon. -- Matt 15:37, 29 March 2008 (CDT)
