Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ingibjorg"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Is this in the same way that, according to the history books, Gillecomgain was definitely the father of Lulach? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:43, 12 April 2010 (CDT) | ::Is this in the same way that, according to the history books, Gillecomgain was definitely the father of Lulach? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:43, 12 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::You mean he's not definitely the biological father in the Gargoyles Universe? Just look at Luach some time, especially as a kid. He's the spitting image of Gillecomgain. But, Macbeth raised him, he's the father. --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 13:50, 12 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::::It's not definite. Just... probable. Besides, even though young Luach looks more like Gillecomgain, I always thought adult Luach looked more like Macbeth. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 16:25, 12 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::::Try this. Look at Gillecomgain's hair [http://gargoyles.dracandros.com/w/images/7/76/YoungGillecomgain.jpg] , now look at Luach's [http://gargoyles.dracandros.com/Image:Luach2.JPG] . Now try telling me Luach isn't Gillecomgain's son. ;) [[User:Dtaina|DTaina]] 17:26, 12 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::::::I'm with Supermorff . . . little Luach resembles Gillecomgain while the older Luach looks like Macbeth. Then again, considering that we now know that Macbeth and Gillecomgain are related half-cousins through half-brothers Findleach and Mail Brigiti, family resemblance is practically a guarantee (not ''even'' getting into Grouch's side of the ''same'' family d: ) so who knows who's the biological father? Meh, I guess I'm fine with the confusion *shrug* --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 02:14, 13 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :::::::For what it's worth, we INTENTIONALLY kept the paterntity ambiguous even when designing both versions of Luach. {{Unsigned|Gweisman}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::::::::Cool. So... was Ingibjorg definitely the mother of Donald Canmore? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:53, 15 April 2010 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 09:53, 15 April 2010
Was Ingibjorg definitely the mother of Donald Canmore? -- Supermorff 12:48, 11 April 2010 (CDT)
- According to the history books, she was. --GregX 16:29, 11 April 2010 (CDT)
- Is this in the same way that, according to the history books, Gillecomgain was definitely the father of Lulach? -- Supermorff 12:43, 12 April 2010 (CDT)
- You mean he's not definitely the biological father in the Gargoyles Universe? Just look at Luach some time, especially as a kid. He's the spitting image of Gillecomgain. But, Macbeth raised him, he's the father. --GregX 13:50, 12 April 2010 (CDT)
- It's not definite. Just... probable. Besides, even though young Luach looks more like Gillecomgain, I always thought adult Luach looked more like Macbeth. -- Supermorff 16:25, 12 April 2010 (CDT)
- I'm with Supermorff . . . little Luach resembles Gillecomgain while the older Luach looks like Macbeth. Then again, considering that we now know that Macbeth and Gillecomgain are related half-cousins through half-brothers Findleach and Mail Brigiti, family resemblance is practically a guarantee (not even getting into Grouch's side of the same family d: ) so who knows who's the biological father? Meh, I guess I'm fine with the confusion *shrug* --Pheon 02:14, 13 April 2010 (CDT)
- For what it's worth, we INTENTIONALLY kept the paterntity ambiguous even when designing both versions of Luach. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Gweisman (talk).
- Cool. So... was Ingibjorg definitely the mother of Donald Canmore? -- Supermorff 12:53, 15 April 2010 (CDT)