Difference between revisions of "User talk:Supermorff/Tree"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
(Wrong place) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:No, you were right first time. I've now added Gillecomgain's father. I've called him Mail Brigti, though, because 1) this is very much a CIT tree, so I feel happier using a CIT name, and 2) because it's shorter and looks better. I've left out Rennaissance Hunter, though, because I don't know for sure where he comes in the tree. Seems obvious that he's a descendant of Donald Canmore. But is he also an ancestor of Angus Canmore, or would the tree have to split? If you can find out, I'll add him in later. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 13:21, 31 May 2008 (CDT) | :No, you were right first time. I've now added Gillecomgain's father. I've called him Mail Brigti, though, because 1) this is very much a CIT tree, so I feel happier using a CIT name, and 2) because it's shorter and looks better. I've left out Rennaissance Hunter, though, because I don't know for sure where he comes in the tree. Seems obvious that he's a descendant of Donald Canmore. But is he also an ancestor of Angus Canmore, or would the tree have to split? If you can find out, I'll add him in later. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 13:21, 31 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Oh, specifically, I wasn't irritated that there were new characters to add. I was irritated that I hadn't found that response before I made the tree in the first place. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 13:28, 31 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:22, 6 September 2015
Just out of curiosity, why is that irritating? Is it because you feel you need to add other characters to your (awesome) family tree or something else? Also, don't forget the Renaissance Hunter along with Gillecomgain's father. -- Matt 11:53, 31 May 2008 (CDT)
- No, you were right first time. I've now added Gillecomgain's father. I've called him Mail Brigti, though, because 1) this is very much a CIT tree, so I feel happier using a CIT name, and 2) because it's shorter and looks better. I've left out Rennaissance Hunter, though, because I don't know for sure where he comes in the tree. Seems obvious that he's a descendant of Donald Canmore. But is he also an ancestor of Angus Canmore, or would the tree have to split? If you can find out, I'll add him in later. -- Supermorff 13:21, 31 May 2008 (CDT)
- Oh, specifically, I wasn't irritated that there were new characters to add. I was irritated that I hadn't found that response before I made the tree in the first place. -- Supermorff 13:28, 31 May 2008 (CDT)
