Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tintagel"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this whole article be listed as a CiT page until Tintagel is actually mentioned. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 07:32, 13 September 2008 (CDT) | Shouldn't this whole article be listed as a CiT page until Tintagel is actually mentioned. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 07:32, 13 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Yep. Not sure exactly what to do with the paragraph currently listed as CIT, since that's really supposition. It's also the only thing that vaguely connects Tintagel to the events of the ''Gargoyles'' series. In either case, it would probably be best to follow our own conventions and remove the CIT format for that paragraph. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 09:31, 13 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Agreed. I'll do it when I add some links. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 10:50, 13 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:50, 13 September 2008
Shouldn't this whole article be listed as a CiT page until Tintagel is actually mentioned. -- Matt 07:32, 13 September 2008 (CDT)
- Yep. Not sure exactly what to do with the paragraph currently listed as CIT, since that's really supposition. It's also the only thing that vaguely connects Tintagel to the events of the Gargoyles series. In either case, it would probably be best to follow our own conventions and remove the CIT format for that paragraph. -- Supermorff 09:31, 13 September 2008 (CDT)
- Agreed. I'll do it when I add some links. -- Matt 10:50, 13 September 2008 (CDT)
