Difference between revisions of "User talk:Matt"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Appearances sections)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
==Appearances sections==
 
==Appearances sections==
I looked up how to implement columns, and I added some to [[David Xanatos]] (I've said as much at [[Talk:Appearances Section]]). It's simple markup, although it might be worth making a bit more complicated in order to prettify it. To be honest, none of the Appearances sections you and Greg have added look outrageously long, except for the Xanatos one and maybe the [[Demona]] one as well. But it's something to keep in mind if we need it later. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 14:55, 31 December 2007 (CST)
+
I looked up how to implement columns, and I added some to [[David Xanatos]] (I've said as much at [[Talk:Appearences Section]]). It's simple markup, although it might be worth making a bit more complicated in order to prettify it. To be honest, none of the Appearances sections you and Greg have added look outrageously long, except for the Xanatos one and maybe the [[Demona]] one as well. But it's something to keep in mind if we need it later. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 14:55, 31 December 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 12:56, 31 December 2007

Dave was actually in there in the TV version of "The Journey", but not the comic. Greg told me the comic version is canon, not the TV version, so Dave comes out.

As for Taro... Greg revealed that in a chat session several years ago.

Hey Matt, I was thinking, and you can probably help me with this. I would like to expand on the timeline to really include exact dates, like Greg occasionally provides. Was wondering if you'd be interested in helping out. I've got a few for "The Reckoning" thanks to the Radio Play script.

Yeah, I'll keep an eye out for dates and edit accordingly. I've already done this a bit where I could, but I think you are right and we can do better on the timeline. Anything else you want to do?

Also, I havn't done much work here in a while and had a question: Are we no longer putting canon-in-training stuff in bold letters? Has something changed? Articles like the "Scone Clan" used to be entirely bold and now they are not, is that because they are part of the c-i-t category now? what about articles like "Hudson" that contain both canon and c-i-t material? Are we still bolding there?

In Canon entries, "Canon-in-training" material is bold. In "Canon-in-training" entries, they're not bold.

So, Scone Clan would not be bold. But "Demona will have two more great loves" would be bold.

I agree, "Future Tense" was all a nightmarish fantasy.

Looking very good. I'll think of a place for the "Future Tense" dates.

I'm currently asking Greg to clarify a couple of dates.


Appearances sections

I looked up how to implement columns, and I added some to David Xanatos (I've said as much at Talk:Appearences Section). It's simple markup, although it might be worth making a bit more complicated in order to prettify it. To be honest, none of the Appearances sections you and Greg have added look outrageously long, except for the Xanatos one and maybe the Demona one as well. But it's something to keep in mind if we need it later. -- Supermorff 14:55, 31 December 2007 (CST)