Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline"
(Greg is confused by people who seem to KNOW his preferences and yet don't) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
So... the recent entries got me thinking, that new people to the site will probably be confused that the FUTURE section starts 10 years ago. Perhaps we should put an explanatory note somewhere about the comic books? - [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 12:58, 15 June 2007 (CDT) | So... the recent entries got me thinking, that new people to the site will probably be confused that the FUTURE section starts 10 years ago. Perhaps we should put an explanatory note somewhere about the comic books? - [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 12:58, 15 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I suppose it's theoretically possible that I once used BCE and CE in some specific context, but I almost exclusively use BC and AD. Certainly, my own timeline uses BC and AD. Where did you get the idea that I preffered BCE and CE? - gdw | ||
Revision as of 04:12, 19 August 2007
Because this article is in the Canon category, and because canon-in-training information is still subject to change, I propose to put all of the canon-in-training entries in bold. Obviously nearly all the dates are known only through Ask Greg, and they are all formatted in bold anyhow. I'm only interested in bolding entries for events which are not shown or referred to in canon, or (such as the timing of Nokkar's arrival) for which the date is not so much as hinted in the canon. If nobody objects to this, I will start in a week or so. Vaevictis Asmadi 18:46, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
I think we can safely specify that Timedancer happens in 1997, since Tachi hatches in 1998. - Vaevictis Asmadi 13:01, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
- Nevermind, that makes no sense. Vaevictis Asmadi 18:46, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
So... the recent entries got me thinking, that new people to the site will probably be confused that the FUTURE section starts 10 years ago. Perhaps we should put an explanatory note somewhere about the comic books? - Vaevictis Asmadi 12:58, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
I suppose it's theoretically possible that I once used BCE and CE in some specific context, but I almost exclusively use BC and AD. Certainly, my own timeline uses BC and AD. Where did you get the idea that I preffered BCE and CE? - gdw
