Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Spin-Offs"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Once Bad Guys is published, this category will no longer be wholly canon-in-training. But, it certainly won't be wholly canon either. Should we move it? Or should Bad Guys be removed from the category and put in some other, canon, category? -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 17:35, 16 September 2007 (CDT) | Once Bad Guys is published, this category will no longer be wholly canon-in-training. But, it certainly won't be wholly canon either. Should we move it? Or should Bad Guys be removed from the category and put in some other, canon, category? -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 17:35, 16 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I suggest that all the spin-offs remain in this category, but we remove the category from Category:Canon-in-training (so it's ''only'' in Category:Out-of-universe). Then we can put Bad Guys into Category:Canon, the other spin-offs into Category:Canon-in-training. Uh... something like that anyway. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 17:53, 16 September 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 14:53, 16 September 2007
Once Bad Guys is published, this category will no longer be wholly canon-in-training. But, it certainly won't be wholly canon either. Should we move it? Or should Bad Guys be removed from the category and put in some other, canon, category? -- Vaevictis Asmadi 17:35, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
- I suggest that all the spin-offs remain in this category, but we remove the category from Category:Canon-in-training (so it's only in Category:Out-of-universe). Then we can put Bad Guys into Category:Canon, the other spin-offs into Category:Canon-in-training. Uh... something like that anyway. -- Supermorff 17:53, 16 September 2007 (CDT)