Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hunter's Moon Part Two"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why was my grammatical correction reverted? Didn't the airship belong to all three of the Hunters? Is one of them, "The Hunter" while the others weren't? If the ship did belong to all of the Hunters, then it should be Hunters' airship, not Hunter's airship. The latter is the possessive form of the word Hunter, while the former is the possessive form of the word Hunters.--[[User:Trebligoniqua|Trebligoniqua]] 17:07, 18 April 2010 (CDT) | Why was my grammatical correction reverted? Didn't the airship belong to all three of the Hunters? Is one of them, "The Hunter" while the others weren't? If the ship did belong to all of the Hunters, then it should be Hunters' airship, not Hunter's airship. The latter is the possessive form of the word Hunter, while the former is the possessive form of the word Hunters.--[[User:Trebligoniqua|Trebligoniqua]] 17:07, 18 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Uh, looking at the edit history, it looks like you edited it, then reverted it claiming Supermorff did it, then edited back. Am I missing something here? In any case, it should be Hunters' airship as there is more than one Hunter. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 07:23, 19 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:23, 19 April 2010
Why was my grammatical correction reverted? Didn't the airship belong to all three of the Hunters? Is one of them, "The Hunter" while the others weren't? If the ship did belong to all of the Hunters, then it should be Hunters' airship, not Hunter's airship. The latter is the possessive form of the word Hunter, while the former is the possessive form of the word Hunters.--Trebligoniqua 17:07, 18 April 2010 (CDT)
- Uh, looking at the edit history, it looks like you edited it, then reverted it claiming Supermorff did it, then edited back. Am I missing something here? In any case, it should be Hunters' airship as there is more than one Hunter. -- Matt 07:23, 19 April 2010 (CDT)
