Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tamora"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Pretty much. I definitely don't see it as riffing... that was her title, and we know Greg likes to think of any excuse to adapt Shakespeare. Not to mention Greg's "eventually we'd get to everything" sentiments in the past. Besides, we have [[Madame Serena]] on here. Isn't this what canon-in-training is for? --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 08:23, 8 April 2013 (PDT) | :Pretty much. I definitely don't see it as riffing... that was her title, and we know Greg likes to think of any excuse to adapt Shakespeare. Not to mention Greg's "eventually we'd get to everything" sentiments in the past. Besides, we have [[Madame Serena]] on here. Isn't this what canon-in-training is for? --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 08:23, 8 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::In Madame Serena's case, Greg said that she was a character that probably existed in the Gargoyles universe. In Tamora's case, it seemed to me as though he liked the idea of it, but it was only an idea. The big difference is that we know nothing about how Tamora would have been presented in the Gargoyles universe. In the end, it comes down to us interpreting the comment differently; I don't think there's enough there to warrant a page, but I can see how someone might disagree. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 08:13, 9 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 07:13, 9 April 2013
Is this page really here just because Greg called her a "Gargoyles character in the making"? That doesn't seem like a very good reason. From the link, it looks like he's just riffing on the name "Tamara, Queen of the Goths", not saying that he actually has/had any plans to put her in the Gargoyles universe. -- Supermorff 04:42, 8 April 2013 (PDT)
- Pretty much. I definitely don't see it as riffing... that was her title, and we know Greg likes to think of any excuse to adapt Shakespeare. Not to mention Greg's "eventually we'd get to everything" sentiments in the past. Besides, we have Madame Serena on here. Isn't this what canon-in-training is for? --GregX 08:23, 8 April 2013 (PDT)
- In Madame Serena's case, Greg said that she was a character that probably existed in the Gargoyles universe. In Tamora's case, it seemed to me as though he liked the idea of it, but it was only an idea. The big difference is that we know nothing about how Tamora would have been presented in the Gargoyles universe. In the end, it comes down to us interpreting the comment differently; I don't think there's enough there to warrant a page, but I can see how someone might disagree. -- Supermorff 08:13, 9 April 2013 (PDT)
