Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ollie"
(Created page with "Is this CiT? The kid was mentioned in the show. The name and gender are CiT, though. I can see arguments for both. But since he was alluded to on the show, I lean towards canon. ...") |
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this CiT? The kid was mentioned in the show. The name and gender are CiT, though. I can see arguments for both. But since he was alluded to on the show, I lean towards canon. --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 11:02, 9 April 2013 (PDT) | Is this CiT? The kid was mentioned in the show. The name and gender are CiT, though. I can see arguments for both. But since he was alluded to on the show, I lean towards canon. --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 11:02, 9 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I can see that. The actual individual is canonical. If we were going to have a page, we'd have to call it something. The canon-in-training name for a canon individual makes a certain amount of sense. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:35, 9 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:35, 9 April 2013
Is this CiT? The kid was mentioned in the show. The name and gender are CiT, though. I can see arguments for both. But since he was alluded to on the show, I lean towards canon. --GregX 11:02, 9 April 2013 (PDT)
- I can see that. The actual individual is canonical. If we were going to have a page, we'd have to call it something. The canon-in-training name for a canon individual makes a certain amount of sense. -- Supermorff 12:35, 9 April 2013 (PDT)
