Difference between revisions of "Talk:Grimorum Arcanorum"
(→The Magus' account: new section) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== The Magus' account == | == The Magus' account == | ||
| − | Is it Canon in Training, or just Canon, that the Magus wrote down an account of how he had cursed the survivors of the Wyvern Clan in the Grimorum? Xanatos mentioned in "Awakening, Part Two" that that was how he had learned about the castle and the gargoyles, so I'd consider it Canon. | + | Is it Canon in Training, or just Canon, that the Magus wrote down an account of how he had cursed the survivors of the Wyvern Clan in the Grimorum? Xanatos mentioned in "Awakening, Part Two" that that was how he had learned about the castle and the gargoyles, so I'd consider it Canon. [[User:Alpha Sigma Sigma|Alpha Sigma Sigma]] 20:04, 18 May 2013 (PDT) |
Revision as of 19:04, 18 May 2013
Eventually, I'd love for us to do something of a revamp of this page with a histroy section much like we see here, but also a list of each spell we've seen from the Grimorum with the latin incantation, translation and any relevant info on each spell. When we do this, I want to make sure we incorporate this information: http://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?qid=12608 --Matt 11:15, 19 October 2010 (CDT)
- Excellent, I've been looking forward to your planned revamp for some time now. --GregX 01:54, 20 October 2010 (CDT)
- Does it need a revamp, or just a new section added to the bottom of the page? Either way, I wholeheartedly support. -- Supermorff 13:13, 3 November 2010 (CDT)
The Magus' account
Is it Canon in Training, or just Canon, that the Magus wrote down an account of how he had cursed the survivors of the Wyvern Clan in the Grimorum? Xanatos mentioned in "Awakening, Part Two" that that was how he had learned about the castle and the gargoyles, so I'd consider it Canon. Alpha Sigma Sigma 20:04, 18 May 2013 (PDT)
