Category talk:Places
Revision as of 15:04, 24 March 2007 by Supermorff (talk | contribs)
Is it alright if I create a sub-category for Real World Places? I don't know for certain for some of these entries, whether they are real, but I can start. Does anyone else think that Canon Places, Canon-in-Training Places, and Apocryphal Places categories would be useful? -Vaevictis Asmadi
- I considered all of them. Places by canonicity probably aren't worth it, since there's only a handful that aren't actually canon (off the top of my head, Gen-U-Tech Island (Apocryphal) and Castle Carbonek, New Camelot, Crystal Cave (Canon-in-training). There may be a couple more). I did seriously think about making "Category:Real world places", though. I'll help if you start. -- Supermorff 06:41, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
- Well I went ahead and made that category. And having reconsidered things, places by canonicity might be useful after all. Or, at least, Category:Canon places might be useful. Uncertain about the other two. I'll keep thinking about it. -- Supermorff 15:56, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
- I thought about it. May yet make the third category, just for consistency. Probably not worth it, but I do like consistency. -- Supermorff 18:04, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
