Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Places"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is it alright if I create a sub-category for Real World Places? I don't know for certain for some of these entries, whether they are real, but I can start. Does anyone else think that Canon Places, Canon-in-Training Places, and Apocryphal Places categories would be useful? -Vaevictis Asmadi | Is it alright if I create a sub-category for Real World Places? I don't know for certain for some of these entries, whether they are real, but I can start. Does anyone else think that Canon Places, Canon-in-Training Places, and Apocryphal Places categories would be useful? -Vaevictis Asmadi | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I considered all of them. Places by canonicity probably aren't worth it, since there's only a handful that aren't actually canon (off the top of my head, [[Gen-U-Tech Island]] (Apocryphal) and [[Castle Carbonek]], [[New Camelot]], [[Crystal Cave]] (Canon-in-training). There may be a couple more). I did seriously think about making "[[:Category:Real world places]]", though. I'll help if you start. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 06:41, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Well I went ahead and made that category. And having reconsidered things, places by canonicity might be useful after all. Or, at least, [[:Category:Canon places]] might be useful. Uncertain about the other two. I'll keep thinking about it. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 15:56, 21 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I thought about it. May yet make the third category, just for consistency. Probably not worth it, but I do like consistency. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 18:04, 24 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:04, 24 March 2007
Is it alright if I create a sub-category for Real World Places? I don't know for certain for some of these entries, whether they are real, but I can start. Does anyone else think that Canon Places, Canon-in-Training Places, and Apocryphal Places categories would be useful? -Vaevictis Asmadi
- I considered all of them. Places by canonicity probably aren't worth it, since there's only a handful that aren't actually canon (off the top of my head, Gen-U-Tech Island (Apocryphal) and Castle Carbonek, New Camelot, Crystal Cave (Canon-in-training). There may be a couple more). I did seriously think about making "Category:Real world places", though. I'll help if you start. -- Supermorff 06:41, 17 March 2007 (CDT)
- Well I went ahead and made that category. And having reconsidered things, places by canonicity might be useful after all. Or, at least, Category:Canon places might be useful. Uncertain about the other two. I'll keep thinking about it. -- Supermorff 15:56, 21 March 2007 (CDT)
- I thought about it. May yet make the third category, just for consistency. Probably not worth it, but I do like consistency. -- Supermorff 18:04, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
