Difference between revisions of "Talk:Angela"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I think it is HIGHLY likely that Angela will have more rookery children than just her own three biological ones. Greg has implied this a lot like [http://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?qid=1679 | + | I think it is HIGHLY likely that Angela will have more rookery children than just her own three biological ones. Greg has implied this a lot like [http://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?qid=1679 here] and many other pages. It is CiT of course, but still, I think it is likely and implied by Greg's responses on the matter. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 16:14, 1 January 2008 (CST) |
| + | |||
| + | :Okay, well spotted. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 16:33, 1 January 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I added that pic done by D.Taina of Angela's new outfit because, well, I thought it looked better. But if there are objections, we can switch it back. --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 04:07, 1 March 2017 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:07, 1 March 2017
I think it is HIGHLY likely that Angela will have more rookery children than just her own three biological ones. Greg has implied this a lot like here and many other pages. It is CiT of course, but still, I think it is likely and implied by Greg's responses on the matter. -- Matt 16:14, 1 January 2008 (CST)
- Okay, well spotted. -- Supermorff 16:33, 1 January 2008 (CST)
I added that pic done by D.Taina of Angela's new outfit because, well, I thought it looked better. But if there are objections, we can switch it back. --GregX 04:07, 1 March 2017 (PST)
