Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dominic Dracon (Apocrypha)"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I believe it was originally for Goliath Chronicles. But, if you think we should integrate them into main pages, I'm fine either way. --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 14:55, 11 September 2009 (CDT) | :I believe it was originally for Goliath Chronicles. But, if you think we should integrate them into main pages, I'm fine either way. --[[User:Greg Bishansky|GregX]] 14:55, 11 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I don't feel strongly, but I don't really get the need for a separate page, when a separate section would seemingly do the trick. But maybe I'm missing the rationale.--[[User:Gweisman|Gweisman]] 06:29, 12 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:29, 12 September 2009
Explain to me again why we have separate pages for Apocrypha, as opposed to just making it a section of such-and-such character's regular page?--Gweisman 14:45, 11 September 2009 (CDT)
- I believe it was originally for Goliath Chronicles. But, if you think we should integrate them into main pages, I'm fine either way. --GregX 14:55, 11 September 2009 (CDT)
- I don't feel strongly, but I don't really get the need for a separate page, when a separate section would seemingly do the trick. But maybe I'm missing the rationale.--Gweisman 06:29, 12 September 2009 (CDT)
