Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tazmanian Tiger"
(forgot to initial) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Go right ahead. | :Go right ahead. | ||
| − | :For the record, it was a bank. I suppose you could put 'bank' under CIT, but that seems somewhat pointless to me. | + | :For the record, it was a bank. I suppose you could put 'bank' under CIT, but that seems somewhat pointless to me. -- gdw |
| − | + | Also are Tazmania and Tasmania (and variants) interchangable? -- gdw | |
| − | + | Also, TT (the guy in the costume) is from Tazmania, not Australia... Though the former is legally part of the latter, would he consider himself Australian? - gdw | |
Revision as of 03:14, 30 November 2007
I see no mention anywhere that Taz was robbing a bank. There is nothing in the comic that backs this up. He had a sack but it could've contained anything. Perhaps this should be changed til we know otherwise. --Matt 22:46, 29 November 2007 (CST)
- Go right ahead.
- For the record, it was a bank. I suppose you could put 'bank' under CIT, but that seems somewhat pointless to me. -- gdw
Also are Tazmania and Tasmania (and variants) interchangable? -- gdw
Also, TT (the guy in the costume) is from Tazmania, not Australia... Though the former is legally part of the latter, would he consider himself Australian? - gdw
