Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline"
(responding to Greg) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I suppose it's theoretically possible that I once used BCE and CE in some specific context, but I almost exclusively use BC and AD. Certainly, my own timeline uses BC and AD. Where did you get the idea that I preffered BCE and CE? - gdw | I suppose it's theoretically possible that I once used BCE and CE in some specific context, but I almost exclusively use BC and AD. Certainly, my own timeline uses BC and AD. Where did you get the idea that I preffered BCE and CE? - gdw | ||
:I was making an inference based on one of your rambles where you discuss the timeline you wrote. The ramble in question is [http://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?rid=499 here]. I figured since you wrote "from 9386 B.C.E." that was the convention you were using for your written version of the timeline. I suppose I was incorrect in making that deduction?--[[User:M m hawk|Moeen]] 09:46, 19 August 2007 (CDT) | :I was making an inference based on one of your rambles where you discuss the timeline you wrote. The ramble in question is [http://www.s8.org/gargoyles/askgreg/search.php?rid=499 here]. I figured since you wrote "from 9386 B.C.E." that was the convention you were using for your written version of the timeline. I suppose I was incorrect in making that deduction?--[[User:M m hawk|Moeen]] 09:46, 19 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Alright, next time somebody decides to re-format the whole wiki without asking first, I'm going to let somebody else standardise everything. | ||
| + | ::The lesson here is use Talk and ask before making big changes that affect multiple pages! -- [[User:Vaevictis Asmadi|Vaevictis Asmadi]] 10:34, 19 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:34, 19 August 2007
Because this article is in the Canon category, and because canon-in-training information is still subject to change, I propose to put all of the canon-in-training entries in bold. Obviously nearly all the dates are known only through Ask Greg, and they are all formatted in bold anyhow. I'm only interested in bolding entries for events which are not shown or referred to in canon, or (such as the timing of Nokkar's arrival) for which the date is not so much as hinted in the canon. If nobody objects to this, I will start in a week or so. Vaevictis Asmadi 18:46, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
I think we can safely specify that Timedancer happens in 1997, since Tachi hatches in 1998. - Vaevictis Asmadi 13:01, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
- Nevermind, that makes no sense. Vaevictis Asmadi 18:46, 24 July 2007 (CDT)
So... the recent entries got me thinking, that new people to the site will probably be confused that the FUTURE section starts 10 years ago. Perhaps we should put an explanatory note somewhere about the comic books? - Vaevictis Asmadi 12:58, 15 June 2007 (CDT)
I suppose it's theoretically possible that I once used BCE and CE in some specific context, but I almost exclusively use BC and AD. Certainly, my own timeline uses BC and AD. Where did you get the idea that I preffered BCE and CE? - gdw
- I was making an inference based on one of your rambles where you discuss the timeline you wrote. The ramble in question is here. I figured since you wrote "from 9386 B.C.E." that was the convention you were using for your written version of the timeline. I suppose I was incorrect in making that deduction?--Moeen 09:46, 19 August 2007 (CDT)
- Alright, next time somebody decides to re-format the whole wiki without asking first, I'm going to let somebody else standardise everything.
- The lesson here is use Talk and ask before making big changes that affect multiple pages! -- Vaevictis Asmadi 10:34, 19 August 2007 (CDT)
