Difference between revisions of "Talk:Maíl Brigti"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::So, Greg... you just decided to change this, huh? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 14:23, 27 November 2008 (CST) | :::So, Greg... you just decided to change this, huh? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 14:23, 27 November 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey, Todd, so the idea really isn't that Ruadri "disinherited" Brigti, so much as that Ruadri was the bastard son of Ruadri's night with a peasant girl. Though older than Findlaech, Brigti was NEVER really inherited to BE disinherited (as he was illegitimate). On the one hand, it currently just reads a bit misleading, I guess to me. But on the other hand, I realize that none of this is spelled out in any canon materials, so I didn't know if I should change it.--[[User:Gweisman|Gweisman]] 03:05, 14 September 2009 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:05, 14 September 2009
Should we move this entry to Maíl Brigti? I know the name is CiT, but it feels awkward to have him listed only as "Gillecomgain's father" when we do have an actual name, CiT or not. GregX
- Doesn't feel awkward to me, but I would quite like to hear what other people think. -- Supermorff 09:07, 17 May 2008 (CDT)
- "Gillecomgain's father" is a little awkward, I'll admit, but it is all we have in canon to work with. Using a CiT name for a canon character could be problematic. And he isn't neccesarily all alone. We also have Hudson's Mate and Demona's Second. So, I say we leave it as it is. The only change I'd make would be capitalizing the word 'father', but thats a whole other thing. -- Matt 09:18, 17 May 2008 (CDT)
- So, Greg... you just decided to change this, huh? -- Supermorff 14:23, 27 November 2008 (CST)
Hey, Todd, so the idea really isn't that Ruadri "disinherited" Brigti, so much as that Ruadri was the bastard son of Ruadri's night with a peasant girl. Though older than Findlaech, Brigti was NEVER really inherited to BE disinherited (as he was illegitimate). On the one hand, it currently just reads a bit misleading, I guess to me. But on the other hand, I realize that none of this is spelled out in any canon materials, so I didn't know if I should change it.--Gweisman 03:05, 14 September 2009 (CDT)
