Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hunter's Moon Part Two"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why was my grammatical correction reverted? Didn't the airship belong to all three of the Hunters? Is one of them, "The Hunter" while the others weren't? If the ship did belong to all of the Hunters, then it should be Hunters' airship, not Hunter's airship. The latter is the possessive form of the word Hunter, while the former is the possessive form of the word Hunters.--[[User:Trebligoniqua|Trebligoniqua]] 17:07, 18 April 2010 (CDT) | Why was my grammatical correction reverted? Didn't the airship belong to all three of the Hunters? Is one of them, "The Hunter" while the others weren't? If the ship did belong to all of the Hunters, then it should be Hunters' airship, not Hunter's airship. The latter is the possessive form of the word Hunter, while the former is the possessive form of the word Hunters.--[[User:Trebligoniqua|Trebligoniqua]] 17:07, 18 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :Uh, looking at the edit history, it looks like you edited it, then reverted it claiming Supermorff did it, then edited back. Am I missing something here? In any case, it should be Hunters' airship as there is more than one Hunter. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 07:23, 19 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | ::Um, ok. If I did, apologies all around. I don't even know who Supermorff is.--[[User:Trebligoniqua|Trebligoniqua]] 11:39, 19 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::That would be me. I was the one that gave you editing privileges. Anyway, yeah it looks as though you may have accidentally reverted it yourself, although the comment that came up during the revert is an automatic thing that said you were reverting the edit to the last version done by me. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 11:40, 20 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:40, 20 April 2010
Why was my grammatical correction reverted? Didn't the airship belong to all three of the Hunters? Is one of them, "The Hunter" while the others weren't? If the ship did belong to all of the Hunters, then it should be Hunters' airship, not Hunter's airship. The latter is the possessive form of the word Hunter, while the former is the possessive form of the word Hunters.--Trebligoniqua 17:07, 18 April 2010 (CDT)
- Uh, looking at the edit history, it looks like you edited it, then reverted it claiming Supermorff did it, then edited back. Am I missing something here? In any case, it should be Hunters' airship as there is more than one Hunter. -- Matt 07:23, 19 April 2010 (CDT)
- Um, ok. If I did, apologies all around. I don't even know who Supermorff is.--Trebligoniqua 11:39, 19 April 2010 (CDT)
- That would be me. I was the one that gave you editing privileges. Anyway, yeah it looks as though you may have accidentally reverted it yourself, although the comment that came up during the revert is an automatic thing that said you were reverting the edit to the last version done by me. -- Supermorff 11:40, 20 April 2010 (CDT)
