Difference between revisions of "Talk:Series Bible"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I suppose this is cool information to have on each page, but I have two concerns. First, I think each page needs a disclaimer on this section explaining what it is and where it came from. As it is, it seems awfully repetitive of the History Sections and pointless. An explanation makes it a cooler thing to have. Secondly, while the vast majority of information in these blurbs is canonical, there is some stuff I would definitly call canon-in-training and I think it needs to be marked as such. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 19:28, 1 January 2008 (CST)
+
I suppose this is cool information to have on each page, but I have some concerns. First, I think each page needs a disclaimer on this section explaining what it is and where it came from. As it is, it seems awfully repetitive of the History Sections and pointless. An explanation makes it a cooler thing to have. Secondly, while the vast majority of information in these blurbs is canonical, there is some stuff I would definitly call canon-in-training and I think it needs to be marked as such. Finally, I don't want to piss of Greg B or anything, but I really think when a major change is made to dozens of high profile pages, it really should be mentioned first and discussed. I'm not saying I don't like the Series Bible stuff, nor am I saying it should be removed until we've talked about it, I just feel that something this major should've been made known to the staff here before implementation, we could've avoided these concerns before they became problems. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 19:28, 1 January 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 17:45, 1 January 2008

I suppose this is cool information to have on each page, but I have some concerns. First, I think each page needs a disclaimer on this section explaining what it is and where it came from. As it is, it seems awfully repetitive of the History Sections and pointless. An explanation makes it a cooler thing to have. Secondly, while the vast majority of information in these blurbs is canonical, there is some stuff I would definitly call canon-in-training and I think it needs to be marked as such. Finally, I don't want to piss of Greg B or anything, but I really think when a major change is made to dozens of high profile pages, it really should be mentioned first and discussed. I'm not saying I don't like the Series Bible stuff, nor am I saying it should be removed until we've talked about it, I just feel that something this major should've been made known to the staff here before implementation, we could've avoided these concerns before they became problems. -- Matt 19:28, 1 January 2008 (CST)