Difference between revisions of "Talk:Generations (review)"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Good points all, but I don't think we should necessarily dictate absolutely everything. For example, I wouldn't want separate pages for each person's review if half of them were only a single paragraph long. We could say that reviews can go in a single page, but split off exceptionally long reviews and link to them. Some (e.g. Todd Jensen's, as now) could even go in the main article for the episode. I don't know. Just my thoughts. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 13:40, 14 May 2008 (CDT) | :Good points all, but I don't think we should necessarily dictate absolutely everything. For example, I wouldn't want separate pages for each person's review if half of them were only a single paragraph long. We could say that reviews can go in a single page, but split off exceptionally long reviews and link to them. Some (e.g. Todd Jensen's, as now) could even go in the main article for the episode. I don't know. Just my thoughts. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 13:40, 14 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | That's a good idea, I think, for anyone who wants to write reviews. | ||
+ | But what about summaries? Most of the episodes on here don't have one.--[[User:PGFish|PGFish]] 20:47, 14 May 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 17:47, 14 May 2008
Review Protocol Suggestions
Okay, so we currently have three reviews of TGC episodes. If we want to keep them around (and I have no problem with that, I suggest with adopt some guidelines for how reviews should work:
1. Anyone who wished to may write a review, commentary, or ramble for any Gargoyles story (TV series, TGC, Marvel comics, Disney Adventures comics, SLG comic, whatever) excluding fanfiction, which is not covered on this site. Since this is a wiki, I think we should give everyone a shot at voicing their opinions, even if it means we end up with 79 reviews of "Future Tense."
2. We can either have a single review page for every story and each person's review would be a different section (this could potentially get very long), or create a separate page for each person's review with the title format "The Mirror (Demonskrye's Review)" and link to all of them from the story's main page.
Aside from that, we can make any other rules we think are necessary, such as no references to fanfiction, no direct putdowns of the creators, and so on. And we should probably make a "Reviews and Commentaries" category if we decide to go ahead with this.
Thoughts? -- Demonskrye 10:37, 14 May 2008 (CDT)
- Good points all, but I don't think we should necessarily dictate absolutely everything. For example, I wouldn't want separate pages for each person's review if half of them were only a single paragraph long. We could say that reviews can go in a single page, but split off exceptionally long reviews and link to them. Some (e.g. Todd Jensen's, as now) could even go in the main article for the episode. I don't know. Just my thoughts. -- Supermorff 13:40, 14 May 2008 (CDT)
That's a good idea, I think, for anyone who wants to write reviews. But what about summaries? Most of the episodes on here don't have one.--PGFish 20:47, 14 May 2008 (CDT)