Difference between revisions of "Talk:Maíl Brigti"

From GargWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:Gillecomgain's father moved to Talk:Maíl Brigti)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
::"Gillecomgain's father" ''is'' a little awkward, I'll admit, but it is all we have in canon to work with. Using a CiT name for a canon character could be problematic. And he isn't neccesarily all alone. We also have [[Hudson's Mate]] and [[Demona's Second]]. So, I say we leave it as it is. The only change I'd make would be capitalizing the word 'father', but thats a whole other thing. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 09:18, 17 May 2008 (CDT)
 
::"Gillecomgain's father" ''is'' a little awkward, I'll admit, but it is all we have in canon to work with. Using a CiT name for a canon character could be problematic. And he isn't neccesarily all alone. We also have [[Hudson's Mate]] and [[Demona's Second]]. So, I say we leave it as it is. The only change I'd make would be capitalizing the word 'father', but thats a whole other thing. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 09:18, 17 May 2008 (CDT)
 +
 +
:::So, Greg... you just decided to change this, huh? -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 14:23, 27 November 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 12:23, 27 November 2008

Should we move this entry to Maíl Brigti? I know the name is CiT, but it feels awkward to have him listed only as "Gillecomgain's father" when we do have an actual name, CiT or not. GregX

Doesn't feel awkward to me, but I would quite like to hear what other people think. -- Supermorff 09:07, 17 May 2008 (CDT)
"Gillecomgain's father" is a little awkward, I'll admit, but it is all we have in canon to work with. Using a CiT name for a canon character could be problematic. And he isn't neccesarily all alone. We also have Hudson's Mate and Demona's Second. So, I say we leave it as it is. The only change I'd make would be capitalizing the word 'father', but thats a whole other thing. -- Matt 09:18, 17 May 2008 (CDT)
So, Greg... you just decided to change this, huh? -- Supermorff 14:23, 27 November 2008 (CST)