Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lexington"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::Could we just say that instead? Not sure how that would be formatted. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:22, 11 March 2012 (PDT) | ::Could we just say that instead? Not sure how that would be formatted. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 12:22, 11 March 2012 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::We've had issues like this in the past. How do we cite things Greg has said at the Gatherings or whatnot? Something we should think about. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 06:36, 12 March 2012 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:36, 12 March 2012
Cybergoyle
"In Puck's Future Tense world, Lexington initially appeared as part of the resistance against Xanatos, decked out in numerous cyborg replacements and armor, and was truly a cybergoyle." I'm confused. Is there something called a "cybergoyle" that I'm not aware of? Caswin 18:25, 19 January 2008 (CST)
Crush on Staghart
Where did this info come from? The Twitter post doesn't have a source. -- Supermorff 04:06, 11 March 2012 (PDT)
- It came from Greg at a con. --GregX 10:28, 11 March 2012 (PDT)
- Could we just say that instead? Not sure how that would be formatted. -- Supermorff 12:22, 11 March 2012 (PDT)
- We've had issues like this in the past. How do we cite things Greg has said at the Gatherings or whatnot? Something we should think about. -- Matt 06:36, 12 March 2012 (PDT)
