Talk:Vampire

Canon-in-training?

I'm uncertain whether or not this article falls under CIT or not. While vampires have been referenced various times in the canon, it's always been in the context of folklore or Elisa's famous Dracula quips. So far we've been given no canonical confirmation for the actual existence of vampires in the Gargoyles Universe. I'd really appreciate input from someone with more seniority here.--Algernon 09:44, 19 December 2008 (CST)

It's just my personal opinion (and I don't put much stock in seniority), but I think this page is probably canon because of the reference by Katharine. Some of the information on the page won't be, like references to Dracula existing in the Gargoyles universe. -- Supermorff 14:54, 19 December 2008 (CST)

Okay, how does it look now?--Algernon 15:03, 19 December 2008 (CST)

I like it. -- Supermorff 15:28, 19 December 2008 (CST)

Now wait a minute. I agree that this page is Canon (though some info in it should be CiT), but if this page is canon, why is Dracula a CiT page? Both were only mentioned, afterall. -- Matt 18:57, 19 December 2008 (CST)

As I mentioned at Talk:Dracula, vampires were mentioned (by Katharine) as if they were real. Dracula was mentioned (and vampires mentioned a second time by Elisa) with no such assumption: they were just pop culture references and metaphors. That's the way I see it anyway. Since Greg has confirmed Dracula exists, you could argue either way, but then things that Greg has revealed outside the show are usually CIT, so... -- Supermorff 06:24, 20 December 2008 (CST)

I'm not looking to argue, and I totally understand what you are saying, but I do think it is a very fine line. I dunno. Not something I'm gonna get bent out of shape about, I just want the GargWiki to have some consistency. -- Matt 07:43, 20 December 2008 (CST)