Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Redemption Squad"
Supermorff (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Works for me. It could stand to be tweaked a bit maybe, but I'm happy the Director gets a mention in the Category. Oh, and sorry about deleting [[Talk: Robyn Canmore]], I wasn't paying attention to the bottom stuff. My bad. Sorry bud. --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 11:36, 27 December 2007 (CST) | Works for me. It could stand to be tweaked a bit maybe, but I'm happy the Director gets a mention in the Category. Oh, and sorry about deleting [[Talk: Robyn Canmore]], I wasn't paying attention to the bottom stuff. My bad. Sorry bud. --[[User:Matt|Matt]] 11:36, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :It's cool. Thanks. -- [[User:Supermorff|Supermorff]] 11:49, 27 December 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:49, 27 December 2007
Should the Director be included in this category? --Matt 07:50, 4 December 2007 (CST)
- No, according to Greg, he's not a member. He's just their boss. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Greg Bishansky (talk).
- Even if he's not a member, a mention in the introductory paragraph might not be a bad idea. Something similar to what we have with Category:Mayan Clan. -- Supermorff 13:04, 4 December 2007 (CST)
- Is this suitable? -- Supermorff 11:33, 27 December 2007 (CST)
Works for me. It could stand to be tweaked a bit maybe, but I'm happy the Director gets a mention in the Category. Oh, and sorry about deleting Talk: Robyn Canmore, I wasn't paying attention to the bottom stuff. My bad. Sorry bud. --Matt 11:36, 27 December 2007 (CST)
- It's cool. Thanks. -- Supermorff 11:49, 27 December 2007 (CST)
