Difference between revisions of "Talk:Series Bible"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | I suppose this is cool information to have on each page, but I have some concerns. First, I think each page needs a disclaimer on this section explaining what it is and where it came from. As it is, it seems awfully repetitive of the History Sections and pointless. | + | I suppose this is cool information to have on each page, but I have some concerns. First, I think each page needs a disclaimer or some explanation on this section explaining what it is and where it came from. As it is, it seems awfully repetitive of the History Sections and pointless. Worse than that, on some pages, like [[Beth Maza]], the series bible entry looks ludicrously dated RIGHT UNDER the History Section. Maybe this section should go near Production Background or something. Secondly, while the vast majority of information in these blurbs is canonical, there is some stuff I would definitly call canon-in-training and I think it needs to be marked as such. Finally, I don't want to piss of Greg B or anything, but I really think when a major change is made to dozens of high profile pages, it really should be mentioned first and discussed. I'm not saying I don't like the Series Bible stuff (in fact, I find a lot of info in it cool and interesting), nor am I saying it should be removed until we've talked about it, I just feel that something this major should've been made known to the staff here before implementation, we could've avoided these concerns before they became problems. -- [[User:Matt|Matt]] 19:28, 1 January 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 18:59, 1 January 2008
I suppose this is cool information to have on each page, but I have some concerns. First, I think each page needs a disclaimer or some explanation on this section explaining what it is and where it came from. As it is, it seems awfully repetitive of the History Sections and pointless. Worse than that, on some pages, like Beth Maza, the series bible entry looks ludicrously dated RIGHT UNDER the History Section. Maybe this section should go near Production Background or something. Secondly, while the vast majority of information in these blurbs is canonical, there is some stuff I would definitly call canon-in-training and I think it needs to be marked as such. Finally, I don't want to piss of Greg B or anything, but I really think when a major change is made to dozens of high profile pages, it really should be mentioned first and discussed. I'm not saying I don't like the Series Bible stuff (in fact, I find a lot of info in it cool and interesting), nor am I saying it should be removed until we've talked about it, I just feel that something this major should've been made known to the staff here before implementation, we could've avoided these concerns before they became problems. -- Matt 19:28, 1 January 2008 (CST)
